The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) has come out to defend its role in the vetting of Cabinet Secretary nominees, specifically addressing claims regarding Wycliffe Oparanya.
In a statement, the EACC noted, “The Commission has noted a false narrative being bandied around by a section of leaders that it ‘refused to clear Hon. Wycliffe Oparanya for appointment as Cabinet Secretary’. This is not the true position.”
The EACC clarified that its mandate does not include the power to clear or bar individuals from holding public office.
Instead, the Commission provides factual information regarding the integrity status of each candidate as of the relevant date, without passing any judgment.
“What the Commission does is to provide facts on record regarding the integrity status of each candidate as at the material date, without passing any judgment. ” the statement added.
This distinction is crucial, as it underscores the EACC’s role as an information provider rather than a decision-maker.
In response to inquiries from Parliament, the EACC conducted integrity vetting for all Cabinet Secretary nominees. The Commission emphasized that it is now up to the Parliamentary Vetting Committee to determine how to utilize the information provided.
The EACC also addressed the ongoing discussions regarding Oparanya’s legal situation, noting that its communication with the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) about his change of mind on prosecution is a separate and broader issue.
In addition, EACC encouraged the public to review its communications, which are part of the Parliamentary records, for a clearer understanding of its position.
