The government’s proposal to reintroduce the Chief Administrative Secretary (CAS) positions, which had been declared unconstitutional, warrants careful scrutiny.

While aligning with the high court ruling is a step toward constitutional compliance, the implications of reestablishing these positions should be thoroughly examined, particularly in light of the current economic challenges facing the country.

At a time when the citizenry is grappling with economic hardships, the move that could potentially add 500 million shillings annually to the government’s wage bill seems inconsistent with the prevailing financial strain.

The pressing issue here is the substantial burden this decision places on taxpayers. The escalating wage bill and the already existing strain on public finances should not be disregarded.

Treasury Cabinet Secretary Prof. Njuguna  Ndung’u, this week,  publicly admitted that the government is broke and struggling to even pay salaries for public servants.

The question that arises is whether this is indeed the opportune moment to increase government expenditure by reinstating the CAS positions.

While acknowledging the necessity to ensure compliance with the law, it is crucial for the government to exercise fiscal responsibility and prioritize the welfare of its citizens.

The allocation of significant funds towards additional administrative positions may be seen as conflicting with the ongoing calls for austerity measures and fiscal discipline.

This decision could further worsen the financial burden on taxpayers, potentially hindering the government’s ability to address more pressing socioeconomic challenges.

Just like the proposal to conduct a referendum to review the constitution, the plan to reintroduce the CAS posts may be a good conversation to have but, unfortunately, it is grossly ill timed.

Copy by Fred Indimuli- host Morning Cafe show