The Environmental Court has dismissed a legal challenge against releasing and cultivating Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) maize in Kenya.

The Environment Court’s ruling hinged on the absence of concrete evidence demonstrating adverse effects on human health or the environment resulting from GMO usage.

The utilization of GMOs has been a contentious topic, particularly concerning their safety for consumption.

The concern came especially after President William Ruto’s administration revoked the ban on GMO imports in the country.

Following this verdict, President Ruto sought to assure the Kenyan populace that genetically modified products do not pose any health risks.

ALSO READ: Masinde Muliro University bans crocs and slippers on campus

Ruto on GMO

The President emphasised his commitment to safeguarding the public’s general well-being and health.

Ruto highlighted that many imported food products already contain modified ingredients, albeit within specific limits stipulated by the Kenya Bureau of Standards (KEBS).

Nevertheless, these limitations have driven up import costs by as much as 30 to 40 per cent.

President Ruto cited countries like South Africa and the USA, which have fully embraced GMOs.

He highlighted that these countries have not reported instances of health issues such as individuals growing “horns” due to GMO consumption.

Ruto further emphasized his scientific background, affirming his dedication to the welfare of the electorate.

Furthermore, the President contended that modified maize could be engineered to resist pests and diseases, potentially reducing the need for pesticides and herbicides.

ALSO READ: Pastor Ezekiel says food during a wedding is for Gossipers

Previous Ruling

However, civil society groups expressed concerns and mounted a legal challenge, seeking to overturn Ruto’s pro-GMO directives.

The society argued that the government had failed to share adequate evidence proving the safety of modified crops. Most importantly, on whether GMOs were safe for human consumption.

In response to these concerns, the High Court sided with the civil society groups, ultimately prohibiting the importation and distribution of GMO products.

In the judgment issued by a three-judge panel, it was emphasized that the government’s evidence in support of the product’s safety was insufficient.

ALSO READ: Dr Ofweneke: Ladies, your husband should not eat your house girls’ food